Keyword

Student-centred learning; teaching strategy; interactive learning, higher education, undergraduate, business students

Abstract

This paper presents an examination of the student response to a small-scale experiment in Student Centred Learning (SCL) in undergraduate business classes. This experiment tests the benefits and the impact of Student Centred Learning approach. Also, this approach will help to discover and identify students at risk. This experiment examined the twelve principles of SCL in the Faculty of Business Administration, Economics & Political Science (BAEPS) as a part of teaching and learning strategy. Feedback was collected from three students’ groups undertaking different modules at three levels within the Business Department.  Each module applied SCL for the first 6 weeks of the module and the rest of semester applied traditional teaching methods. The three groups were undergraduate business students’ classes during one semester at the British University in Egypt (BUE). The feedback from the majority of the three groups reported positive practises. This paper presented a justification and explanation for success and pitfalls in student centred learning and recommended creative interactive teaching strategies. This experiment proved that SCL implementation, together with a traditional approach in teaching and learning, is more effective for undergraduate university students learning route.

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24052/IJHEM/V05N01/ART02


Full Text : PDF

References
  1. Anderson, A. and D. Krathwohl. 2000. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s
  2. Taxonomy of Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest.
  3. Aronson E, Patnoe S. (2011) Cooperation in the classroom: the jigsaw method. 3rd ed. London, GB: Pinter & Martin.
  4. Bell,  L.  &  Baker,  L.,  S.,  (2017):  Student-centred  learning:  a  small-scale  study  of  a  peer-learning  experience  in
  5. undergraduate translation classes, The Language Learning. Journal, DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2016.1278030.
  6. Boekaerts, M. & Cascallar, E., (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation. Education Psychology Review, 18, 199-210. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 32, no. 5: 40–7.
  7. Cornelius-White, J. 2007. Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: a meta-analysis. Review of
  8. Educational Research 77, no. 1: 113–43.
  9. Cottrell, S. (1995). Readiness for autonomy: Investigating learner beliefs. System, 23(2), 195-205.
  10. Davis-McGibony (2010) CM. Protein sequencing jigsaw. J Chem Educ.87:409–411.
  11. Davis, K., Gillette, L., & Robert, J. (2013). How to Ensure That Students Prepare for Class So That Class Time Can Be Used for Deep Learning. Lilly International Conference on College Teaching. Ohio: Oxford.
  12. Education, 95-105.
  13. Elliot, Rob. (2014). Do Students Like the Flipped Classroom? IEEE
  14. Garrison, D., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended Learning: Uncovering its Transformative Potential in Higher Education. Internet and Higher
  15. Handelsman J, Miller S, Pfund C., (2007) Scientific teaching. New York, NY: Freeman.
  16. Hansen, E.J. and J.A. Stephens. 2000. The ethics of learner-centered education: dynamics that impede the process.
  17. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 32, no. 5: 40–7.
  18. Hirsch, E.D. 1998. Reality’s revenge: research and ideology. Arts Education Policy Review 99, no. 4: 3–15. http://home.gwu.edu/~pryder/English11_S02/Hirsch on%20Grasci%20&%20Friere.htm (accessed 4 February, 2018).
  19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00008-8
  20. Luca, J. & Oliver, R., (2003). A framework to promote learning and generic skills. In: Lassner, D. & McNaught, C. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2003. Chesapeake, VA: AACE
  21. Lyman    FT    (1981)    the    responsive    classroom    discussion:    the    inclusion    of    all    students.    In:    Anderson    A,
  22. editor. Mainstreaming digest. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press. pp. 109–113.
  23. Lea, S. J., D. Stephenson, and J. Troy (2003). Higher Education Students’ Attitudes to Student Centred Learning:
  24. Beyond ‘educational bulimia’. Studies in Higher Education 28(3), 321–334
  25. Martinez M, Roser NL, Strecker S. (1998) “I never thought I could be a star”: A reader’s theatre ticket to fluency. Reading Teacher. 1998; 52:326–334.
  26. McCabe, A. and U. O’Connor. 2013. Student-centered learning: the role and responsibility of the lecturer. Teaching in Higher
  27. 29    A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM) www.ijhem.abrmr.com
  28. International Journal of Higher Education Management (IJHEM), Vol. 5 Number 1    August 2018
  29. McDevitt, B. (1997) Learner Autonomy and the Need for Learner Training. Language Learning Journal, 16, 34-39.
  30. McMahon, E.C. 2011. Learner-centered instruction at a small community college: faculty perceptions. PhD diss.Capella
  31. Minnesota, b (2014) a research paper submitted to the faculty of the, department of mathematics and computer science, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in mathematics, Bemidji state university. USA.
  32. Nilson LB. (2010) Teaching at its best. 3rd edition. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  33. Osborne, L.Y. 2008. Adult Students and Learner-Centered Instruction at a Small Community College: A Mixed Method Study.
  34. Prosser, M. and K. Trigwell. 1999. Understanding Learning and Teaching. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  35. Relationships and Critical Factors. Computers & Education, 318-336.
  36. Rogers, C. 1951. Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practices, Implications and Theory. London: Constable.
  37. Rogers, C.R. 1969. Freedom to Learn. Columbus: Merrill.
  38. So, H., & Brush, T. (2008). Student perceptions of Collaborative Learning, Social Presence and Satisfaction in aBlended Learning Environment:
  39. Soliman, N., (2016) Teaching English for Academic Purposes via the Flipped Learning, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 232 (2016) 122 – 129
  40. Sukim, L., (1995) Creative games for the language class by, (Forum) vol.33No 1, January-March 1995.
  41. Tanner KD. (2009) Talking to learn: why biology students should be talking in classrooms and how to make it happen. CBE-Life Sci Ed.8:89–94.