<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<issue_export_package generated_at="2026-06-13T23:08:11+00:00">
  <journal>
    <title>International Journal of Higher Education Management</title>
    <acronym>IJHEM</acronym>
    <issn_print>2054-9849</issn_print>
    <issn_online>2054-9857</issn_online>
    <doi_prefix>https://doi.org/10.24052/IJHEM/</doi_prefix>
  </journal>
  <issue>
    <id>12</id>
    <volume>Volume 07</volume>
    <name>Issue 01</name>
    <published_month>2020-08-01</published_month>
  </issue>
  <articles>
    <article>
      <id>72</id>
      <title>Teaching all students: A holistic and collaborative approach to increasing student success</title>
      <url>https://ijhem.com/details&amp;cid=72</url>
      <published_date>2020-08-30</published_date>
      <abstract>All students who enroll have success as their main goal. However, most institutions focus their resources on programs for students on honor roll, Dean’s list and those progressing academically.  Little resources remain for those students who stumble. In 2015, 36.2% of white students, 22.5% of black students, and 15.5% of Hispanic students had completed four years of college. This shows a 13.7% gap between black and white students and a 20.7% gap between Hispanic and white students (Wellman, 2017). How do we close this gap in educational completion? This study believes that all students can learn. Consequently, there needs to be educational equity and the development of a basis for instruction and assessment of all students’ learning outcomes. This paper represents an exploratory fundamental and qualitative research that aims to present a refocus on the role of faculty in teaching and learning to reach all students in classrooms. It examines a holistic and collaborative approach to increasing student success using evidence -based qualitative analysis of best practices. This approach has four component parts. Part 1 is the Holistic Component that involves engaging all students in the institution; communicating purposefully to them in a timely manner; and providing all-inclusive comprehensive support services (HC). This part develops and implements measurable benchmarks that motivate, encourage, and enable all students. Part 2 is the Collaborative Component which involves bringing six working teams together: faculty, industry, current majors, alumni, career services, and the community (CC). This part engages the team in maintaining a living curriculum that reflects the ever-changing global economy.  Part 3 is Celebration of Student Success (CSS) which entails the collaborative team owning each milestone, reaffirming teamwork while building trust and persistence. Part 4 is the Assessment of Student Progress (ASP) using the holistic and collaborative approach. The paper concludes that holistic and collaborative teamwork that includes, respects, and empowers all students is the key to reducing the college completion gaps that exist among blacks and Hispanic students.  </abstract>
      <references>Adelman, C. (2006). The Toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school though college. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, D.C: Office of Vocational and Adult Education. American College Testing Program (ACT) 2006. Anoopkumar, M., &amp; Rahman, A. M. J. M. Z. (2016). A Review on Data Mining techniques and factors used in Educational Data Mining to predict student amelioration. In 2016 International Conference on Data Mining and Advanced Computing (SAPIENCE), (pp. 122–133). Asif, R., Merceron, A., Abbas, S., &amp; Ghani, N. (2017). Analyzing undergraduate students’ performance using educational data mining. Computers in Education, 113, 177–194. Asif, R., Merceron, A., &amp; Pathan, M. K. (2015). Predicting student academic performance at degree level: A case study. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 7(1), 49–61. Astin, A.W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Bailey, T.R., &amp; Leinbach, D.T. (2005). Is student success considered institutional failure?? The accountability debate at community colleges. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University Bailey, T., Jaggars, S., &amp; Jenkins, D. (2015). Redesigning America’s community colleges: A clearer path to student success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bauman, G. L., Bustillos, L.T., Bensimon, E.M., Brown, M.C., &amp; Bartee, R.D. (2005). Achieving Equitable Educational Outcomes with All Students: The Institution’s Roles and Responsibilities. AAC&amp;U/Ford Foundation. Baum, S., &amp; Payea, K. (2004). Education pays: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. Washington, DC: The College Board.Bensimon 2004 Bensimon, E.M., Dowd, A.C., &amp; Witham, K. (2016). Five principles for enacting equity by design. Diversity &amp; Democracy, 19(1). Brame, C. J. (2019). Inclusive teaching: Creating a welcoming, supportive classroom environment. In Science teaching essentials: Short guides to good practice (pp. 3–14). San Diego: Elsevier/Academic Press. Calvet Liñán, L., &amp; Juan Pérez, Á. A. (2015). Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: differences, similarities, and time evolution. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 12(3), 98. Center for Community College Student Engagement. (2013). A matter of degrees: Engaging practices, engaging students (High-impact practices for community college student engagement). Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin, Community College Leadership Program. Chen, X. (2015). STEM attrition among high-performing college students: Scope and potential causes. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 5(1), 41–59. Dadgar, M., Venezia, A., Nodine, T., &amp; Bracco, K. R. (2013). Providing structured pathways to guide students toward completion. San Francisco: WestEd. Dewsbury, B. M. (2017). Context determines strategies for “activating” the inclusive classroom. Journal of Microbiology &amp; Biology Education, 18(3). 18.3.66. Dewsbury, B. M. (2019). Deep teaching: A conceptual model for inclusive approaches to higher education STEM pedagogy. Cultural Studies in Science Education. doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9891-z. Accessed 3/30/2019 Dutt, A., Ismail, M. A., &amp; Herawan, T. (2017). A systematic review on educational data mining. IEEE Access, 5, 15991–16005. Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., ... Okpodu, C. M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), es5. Finley, A. &amp; McNair, T. (2013). Assessing underserved students' engagement in high-impact practices. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Finn, J. D., &amp; Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234. Freeman, T. M., Anderman, L. H., &amp; Jensen, J. M. (2007). Sense of belongingness of college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 203–220. Freire, P. (1970). Goffee, R., &amp; Jones, G. (2000, September/October). Why should anyone be led by you? Harvard Business Review.  Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2000/09/why-should-anyone-be-led-by-you. Accessed 1/15/2019. Haak DC, HilleRisLambers J, Pitre E, Freeman S (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science 332, 1213–1216. Hamoud, A. K., Hashim, A. S., &amp; Awadh, W. A. (2018). Predicting Student Performance in Higher Education Institutions Using Decision Tree Analysis. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, in Press, 1. Hearn, J.C. (2006). Student success: What research suggest for policy and practice. Paper presented at the National Symposium on Postsecondary Student Success. Available, https://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/synth_Hearn.pdf . Accessed 2/1/2019. Hearn, J. C. (2015). Outcomes-based funding in historical and comparative contexts. The Lumina Foundation. Available, www.luminafoundation.org/files/resources/hearn-obf-full.pdf . Accessed 1/5/2019 Henderson, S.E. (2008). Admissions' evolving role: From gatekeeper to strategic partner. In B Lauren (Ed.), The College Admissions' Officer's Guide (pp. 1-22) Washington, D.C.: American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers. Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C. L., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M., &amp; Arellano, L. (2012). A model for diverse learning environments: The scholarship on creating and assessing conditions for student success. In J. C. Smart &amp; M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 27, pp. 41–122). New York, NY: Springer. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., &amp; Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature commissioned report for the National Symposium on postsecondary student success. University of California and F. Foundation for Open Access Statistics. Kuh, G.D. (2016). Making learning meaningful: Engaging students in ways that matter to them. In M. Watts (Ed.), Finding the why: Personalizing learning in higher education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No.145. San Francisco: JosseyBass. Kuh, G., O'Donnell, K., &amp; Reed, S. (2013). Ensuring quality &amp; taking high-impact practices to scale. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Moira Cachia, Siobhan Lynam &amp; Rosemary Stock (2018) Academic success: Is it just about the grades? Higher Education Pedagogies, 3:1, 434-439, DOI: 10.1080/23752696.2018.1462096 Martins, M. P. G., Miguéis, V. L., Fonseca, D. S. B., &amp; Alves, A. (2019). A data mining approach for predicting academic success – A case study, (pp. 45–56). Cham: Springer. Maton, K. I., Beason, T. S., Godsay, S., Sto. Domingo, M. R., Bailey, T. C., Sun, S., &amp; Hrabowski, F. A. (2016). Outcomes and processes in the Meyerhoff Scholars program: STEM PhD completion, sense of community, perceived program benefit, science identity, and research-self-efficacy. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15, ar48. Mohamed, M. H., &amp; Waguih, H. M. (2017). Early prediction of student success using a data mining classification technique. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(10), 126–131. Muijs, D., &amp; Reynolds, D. (2011). Effective teaching. Evidence and practice. London: Sage. National Center for Public Policy and High Education 2005 Pascarella, E. T., &amp; Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students (Volume 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., &amp; Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329. Pérez, B., Castellanos, C., &amp; Correal, D. (2018). Predicting student drop-out rates using data mining techniques: A case study, (pp. 111–125). Cham: Springer. Purdie, J. R., &amp; Rosser, V. J. (2011). Examining the academic performance and retention of first-year students in living-learning communities and first year experience courses. College Student Affairs Journal, 29(2), 95. Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between rich and poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In G. J. Duncan &amp; R. J. Murnane (Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances (pp. 91–115). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Reardon, S.F. (2013). The widening income achievement gap. Educational Leadership, 70(8), 10-16. Reason, R. D., Terenzini, P. T., &amp; Domingo, R. J. (2006). First things first: Developing academic competence in the first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 47(2), in press. Schinske, J. N., Perkins, H., Snyder, A., &amp; Wyer, M. (2016). Scientist Spotlight homework assignments shift students’ stereotypes of scientists and enhance science identity in a diverse introductory science class. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar47. Strayhorn, T. L. (2015). Cultural navigation and college student success: What works for ensuring academic excellence (CHEE #What Works Report Series 2015-001). Columbus, OH: Center for Higher Education Enterprise, The Ohio State University. Terenzini, P. T., and Reason, R. D. (2005, November). Parsing the first year of college: A conceptual framework for studying college impact. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia Thelin, J. R. (2011). A history of American higher education (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Valant, J., &amp; Newark, D. A. (2016). The Politics of Achievement Gaps: U.S. Public Opinion on Race-Based and Wealth-Based Differences in Test Scores. Educational Researcher, 45, 331-346. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16658447. Accessed 1/16/2019 Wellman, M. (2017). Report: The Race Gap in Higher Education is Very Real. University of Virginia. https://www.usatoday.com/story/college/2017/03/07/report-the-race-gap-in-higher-education-is-very-real/37428635/. Accessed 1/16/2019 Willems, J., Coertjens, L., Tambuyzer, B., &amp; Donche, V. (2019). Identifying science students at risk in the first year of higher education: the incremental value of non-cognitive variables in predicting early academic achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(4), 847–872. Wilson, D., Jones, D., Bocell, F., Crawford, J., Kim, M. J., Veilleux, N., ... Plett, M. (2015). Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: A multi-institutional study. Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 750–776. Witham, K, Malcom-Piqueux, L., Dowd, A.C., &amp; Bensimon, E.M. (2015). America’s Unmet Promise: The Imperative for Equity in Higher Education. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. York, T.T., Gibson, C., &amp; Rankin, S. (2015). Defining and measuring academic success. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 20 (5), 1–20. [Google Scholar] Zumbrunn, S., McKim, C., Buhs, E., &amp; Hawley, L. R. (2014). Support, belonging, motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: A mixed method study. Instructional Science, 42, 661–684.</references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijhem.com/cdn/article_file/2020-08-30-12-23-32-PM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>Veronica Udeogalanya</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>Academic Success</keyword>
        <keyword>Graduation Rates</keyword>
        <keyword>Students</keyword>
        <keyword>Teaching</keyword>
        <keyword>Undergraduate Education</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <metrics>
        <views>5876</views>
        <downloads>43</downloads>
        <citations>1</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>73</id>
      <title>Embedding RRI in a Higher Education Institution: Lessons learned from Malta</title>
      <url>https://ijhem.com/details&amp;cid=73</url>
      <published_date>2020-08-30</published_date>
      <abstract>Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has recently gained recognition as a guiding principle for research to be more inclusive of societal needs. In response, the University of Malta led an internal qualitative study to assess attitudes and perceptions towards RRI. This approach paved the way for cultural and institutional changes that may not have developed otherwise. Academics, non-academic staff and students were interviewed alongside an online questionnaire totaling 29 face-to-face interviews and 226 survey responses. Thematic coding analysis revealed the core theme of fragmentation. Sub-themes stemming from fragmentation include challenges around collaboration, communication, politics, knowledge systems thinking and varied ideas of responsibility in research. While most respondents are in favor of RRI practice, several barriers affect an individual’s capacity to practice this approach, including lack of time and resources, and lack of recognition of public engagement (PE) efforts in the university’s current policies and governance structure. This research allowed for the development of a targeted Action Plan and set of initiatives to successfully begin implementing a culture of RRI best practice, including the establishment of the Committee for Engaged Research and fostering an internal network of individuals who are exemplary in RRI best practice. The thorough and targeted process has produced more significant and tangible results than moving directly into implementation, while also reducing the risk of future problems emerging from rushed initiatives. The authors conclude that such an approach is imperative for successful RRI implementation within institutions, especially when considering cultural/local context.     </abstract>
      <references>Alashwal, A. and Hamzah, A.R. (2014). Developing a conceptual framework of fragmentation in construction. Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya. Aniekwe, C.C., Hayman, R. and Toner, A. (2012). Academic-NGO collaboration in international development research: A reflection on the issues. Böger, E., Carrier, M., Gartzlaff, M. and König, R. (2017). Survey Result Report. Deliverable 3.5. NUCLEUS project. Briguglio, M. and Bonello, S. (2018). No Man's Land: People, place and pollution. Kite Publishing: Malta. Cadogan, J. (2014). Curiosity-driven “blue sky” research: A threatened vital activity? The Learned Society of Wales. Courchamp, F., Dunne, J.A., Le Maho, Y., May, R.M., Thébaud, C. and Hochberg, M.E. (2015). Fundamental ecology is fundamental. Trends in ecology &amp; evolution, 30(1), pp.9–16. Dentoni, D. and Bitzer, V. (2015). The role(s) of universities in dealing with global wicked problems through multi-stakeholder initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 68–78. Dierckx de Casterlé, B.D., Gastmans, C., Bryon, E. and Denier, Y. (2012). QUAGOL: A guide for qualitative data analysis. International journal of nursing studies, 49(3), pp.360–371. Dijkstra, A.J. and Hanmer, L.C. (2000). Measuring Socio-Economic GENDER Inequality: Toward an Alternative to the UNDP Gender-Related Development Index, Feminist Economics, 6(2), 41–75, Directorate-General for Communication European Commission (2012). Europeans and their languages. Special Eurobarometer, 386. European Commission (2014a). Responsible research and innovation: Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. European Commission (2014b). Rome Declaration on Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe. Euroscientist (2016). Inspiring findings to expand the RRI scene. Available at: https://www.euroscientist.com/ [Accessed 12 January 2020]. Falzon, M.A. and Micallef, M. (2008). Sacred island or world empire? Locating far-right movements in and beyond Malta. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 16(3), pp.393–406. Felt, U. (2017). “Response-able practices” or “new bureaucracies of virtue”: the challenges of making RRI work in academic environments. Responsible Innovation, 3, pp. 49–68. Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1). Forsberg, E.M., Shelley-Egan, C., Ladikas, M. and Owen R. (2018). Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation in Research Funding and Research Conducting Organizations—What Have We Learned so Far? Governance and Sustainability of Responsible Research and Innovation Processes, pp. 3–11. Fransman, J., Newman, K. and Cornish, H. (2017). Rethinking Research Partnerships: Discussion Guide and Toolkit. Gerber, A. (2018). RRI: How to ‘mainstream’ the ‘upstream’ engagement. Journal of Science Communication, 17(3), C06. Grimpe, C. and Hussinger, K. (2013). Formal and informal knowledge and technology transfer from academia to industry: Complementarity effects and innovation performance. Industry and innovation, 20(8), pp.683–700. Grinbaum, A. and Groves, C. (2013). What Is “Responsible” about Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, (April 2013), pp. 119–142. Government of Malta (2020). About: The Maltese Islands. Available at: http://www.gov.mt [Accessed 09 February 2020]. Hart, A., Davies, C., Aumann, K., Wenger, E., Aranda, K., Heaver, B. and Wolff, D. (2013). Mobilising knowledge in community-university partnerships: what does a community of practice approach contribute? Contemporary Social Science: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 8(3), pp. 278–291. Kupper, F., Klaassen, P., Rijnen, M., Vermeulen, S., Woertman R. and Broerse, J. (2015). A catalogue of good RRI practices (types, agendas and dimensions). Deliverable 1.4, RRI Tools project. Landa, L.G.G. (2006). Academic Language Barriers and Language Freedom. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(1), pp. 61–81. Leydesdorff, L. (2012). The triple helix, quadruple helix, …, and an N-tuple of helices: explanatory models for analyzing the knowledge-based economy? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), pp.25–35. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. and Bracken, C.C. (2002). Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), pp. 587–604. Lucas, L. (2007). Research and teaching work within university education departments: fragmentation or integration? Journal of further and higher education, 31(1), pp.17–29. MacLaughlin, A., Wihbey, J. and Smith, D.A. (2018). Predicting news coverage of scientific articles. Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Macnaghten, P., Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Wynne, B., Azevedo, A., de Campos, Chilvers, J., Dagnino, R., Di Giulio, G., Frow, E. and Garvey, B. (2014). Responsible innovation across borders: tensions, paradoxes and possibilities. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(2), pp. 191–199. Mahony, N. and Stephansen, H.C. (2017). Engaging with the public in public engagement with research. Research for All, 1(1), pp.35–51. Mauranen, A., Hynninen, N. and Ranta, E. (2010). English as an academic lingua franca: The ELFA project. English for Specific Purposes, 29(3), pp. 183–190. Meijlgaard, N. (2016). Stock Taking/Inventorying (WP2) D2.2 State of the Art Review. HEIRRI Project. National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement (2018). What is public engagement? Available at: https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/ [Accessed 22 February 2020]. NVivo qualitative data analysis software (2015). QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 11. Olmos-Peñuela, J., Molas-Gallart, J. and Castro-Martínez, E. (2013). The role of informal collaborations in the social sciences and humanities, Polytechnic University of Valencia. Owen, R., Stilgoe, J., Macnaghten, P., Gorman, M., Fisher, E. and Guston, D. (2013). A framework for responsible innovation. Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, 31, pp.27–50. Packman, C., Rutt, L. and Williams, G. (2017). The value of experts, the importance of partners, and the worth of the people in between. Participations: Journal of Audience &amp; Reception Studies, 14(1), p. 376. Pudelko, M. and Tenzer, H. (2019). Boundaryless careers or career boundaries? The impact of language barriers on academic careers in international business schools. Academy of Management Learning &amp; Education, 18(2), pp.213–240. Russell, C. (2010). Covering controversial science: Improving reporting on science and public policy. Science and the Media, pp.13–43. Sarewitz, D. (2012). Blue-sky bias should be brought down to Earth. Nature, 481(7379), pp.7–7. Schmidt, B. (2014). Women, research and universities: excellence without gender bias. Paths to Career and Success for Women in Science, pp. 93–116. Senge, P. and Kim, D.H. (2013). From Fragmentation to Integration: Building Learning Communities, Reflections, 12(4). Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business. Selvaraj, S., Borkar, D.S. and Prasad, V. (2014). Media coverage of medical journals: do the best articles make the news? PLoS One, 9(1). Simone, A. (2018). Steering research and innovation through RRI. What horizon for Europe? Journal of Science Communication, 17(3), p.C02. Śliwa, M. and Johansson, M. (2014). How non-native English-speaking staff are evaluated in linguistically diverse organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(9) pp. 1133–1151. Stipp, S.L.S. (2010). Strategic or blue-sky research? Elements, 6(3), pp. 139–140. Tassone, V.C., O’Mahony, C., McKenna, E., Eppink, H.J. and Wals E.J. (2018). (Re-)designing higher education curricula in times of systemic dysfunction: a responsible research and innovation perspective. Higher Education, 76(2), pp. 337–352. Watermeyer, R. (2015). Lost in the ‘third space’: the impact of public engagement in higher education on academic identity, research practice and career progression. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), pp.331–347.</references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijhem.com/cdn/article_file/2020-08-30-12-27-58-PM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>Nika Levikov</author>
        <author>Daniela Quacinella</author>
        <author>Edward Duca</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>Collaboration</keyword>
        <keyword>Fragmentation</keyword>
        <keyword>Engagement</keyword>
        <keyword>Responsible Research and Innovation</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <metrics>
        <views>6243</views>
        <downloads>42</downloads>
        <citations>7</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>74</id>
      <title>A comparative study of perceived transformational, transactional and passive avoidant leadership styles effectiveness within the Ethiopian Public Universities</title>
      <url>https://ijhem.com/details&amp;cid=74</url>
      <published_date>2020-08-30</published_date>
      <abstract>This study aimed at comparing (i) the perceived ratings of leaders', non-leaders' and students' on leadership effectiveness and (ii) perceived ratings of various levels of leadership against transformational, transactional; and passive avoidant dimensions of leadership using a pragmatist philosophy and a quantitative-qualitative, concurrent, mixed cross-sectional descriptive design. Addis Ababa University (AAU), Debre Berhan University (DBU), and Welkite University (WKU) were randomly selected from each of the three-generation Ethiopian public universities. This study was conducted based on original primary data collected from a total of 506 respondents who filled the survey. These included 333 students and 35 teachers; and 5 top, 16 middle, and 34 lower-level- leaders; and 49 non-leaders among the academic; and 4 top, 5 middle, and 7 lower-level- leaders among administrative staff; and 18 others. About 19 interviewees and 3 FGDS were made. A comprehensive LS and LE questionnaire were adapted, besides in-depth interviews, observation, and document analyses. Each respondent rated his/her immediate supervisor. Descriptive and inferential statistics and ANOVA were employed with corresponding tests of hypotheses. The data proved LS midway between transactional and laissez-faire (MD= 2.5) in the five-point scale. The findings included a moderate score of (M=2.73) for administrative staff middle level leaders and (M=3.37) for top-level academic leaders. Further, LS and LE scores varied favoring ratings made by the academic leadership of the top-level across the hierarchy implying ineptitude. Students' and faculties' and administrative staffs' satisfaction, and LS effectiveness were only found slightly above average. Transactional (TRNAL) rather than transformational LS prevailed in the universities. Findings had several practical implications and because of this MoSHE, the boards and the leadership of the universities and future researchers were advised to take their share</abstract>
      <references>Anderson J. C., and Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103(3): 411–423. Armstrong, M. (2006). Strategic Human Resource Management A Guide to Action 10th Edition. London, Kogan Pages. Avolio, B. A., Bass, Bernard (1985). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Instrument (Leader and Rater Form) and Scoring Guide (Form 5X-Short), Mind Garden, Inc. Avolio, B., Bass, Bernard (1995, 2002, 2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire:  Instrument (Leader and Rater Form) and Scoring Guide (Form 5X-Short), Mind Garden, Inc. Awang, Z (2012) A Handbook on Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS. Shah Alam, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi MARA press. Bass, B. M., &amp; Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Bass, B., &amp; Avolio, B. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nded.). Mahwah, NJ:  Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bekele Shibru (2011). Effective Transformational Leadership on Subordinate job satisfaction in leather companies in Ethiopia. Intl. J. of Buss. Mgt. 2,5. PP. 284- 296 Belias, D., and A. Koustelios (2014). "Transformational Leadership and Job Satisfaction in the Banking Sector: A Review." International Review of Management and Marketing 4(3): pp.187-200. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods New York Oxford University Press.  Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, Harper &amp; Row. Collis, J., &amp; Hussey, R. (2014) Business research: a practical guide for undergraduate and Postgraduate students (4thed.). Palgrave Macmillan, pp.54. Cox, S., J.F., et al. (1997). "How Leadership Relates to 360 Degree Performance Ratings."  Group and Organization Management &amp; Organizational History 22(2): 185–209. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, quantitative, And mixed methods approach. Los Angeles, SAGE Publications. FDRE (2015) An Assessment of Public Service Delivery in FDRE: A research Report in Amharic.Unpublished. FDRE (2010). “Growth and Transformation Plan (GTP) 2010/11-2014/15. Addis Ababa.  MoFED." FDRE (2016). Auditor General of the FDRE. Report for the year 2015/16. Presented May 2016. FDRE (2016). Growth and Transformation Plan II (GTP II) (2015/16-2019/20). National Planning Commission. Addis Ababa. Fleenor, J. W., Bryant, Carl (2002). "Leadership Effectiveness and Organizational Culture: An Exploratory Paper." A report presented to A Meeting of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Fornell, C., and Larcker, DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39–50. Hair, J.F., Anderson RE, Tatham RL, et al. (1992) Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Hurduzeu, R.-E. (2015). "The Impact of Leadership on Organizational Performance."  Practical Application of Science 1(7). Husselbein, F. (2013). "Leaders of Change Leaders of The Future." Leader to Leader. Isaac, Robert. G.; Zebra, Wilfred J; and Pitt, Douglas C. (2001). Leadership and motivation: The effective application of expectancy theory. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(2). Kang, S. K., and S. Jin (2015). "What are the Best Practices to Assess Leadership Effectiveness?". Keffyalew G. (2014). Performance ranking of Ethiopia's 31 universities: An old nation as a beginner &amp; in doubt. T. E. O. (TEO). Loveren, V., and R. K (2007). The Effects of Decision-Making and Leadership Styles on Relationships and Perceived Effectiveness in the University Development Context. Martz, Wesley A. (2013). Evaluating Organizational Performance Rational, Natural, and Open System Models. American Journal of Evaluation 34(3): 385-401.DOI.  10.1177/1098214013479151. Minja, D. (2013). "The Signature of Effective Leadership." Public Policy and Administration Research.  3(1). Mintizberg, Henry. (2013). Simply Managing. Berret-Koehler Publishers. Muluken Lemma (2007). An Assessment of Transformational leadership: A Case Paper on Ethiopian Airlines. Faculty of Business and Economics. Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa University. Ndiritu, A., et al. (2015). "Preaching and Drinking Wine: A Necessity for    Transformational Leaders in Effective Schools." International Journal of   Education and Research 3(3). Netemeyer R. G., Johnston, M.W., and Burton, S. (1990) Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equation framework. Journal of Applied Psychology 75(2): 148–157. Northhouse, P. G. (2010). Leadership: Theory and Practice Los Angeles, SAGE Publications Inc. Nunnaly, J. (1978) Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Nye, J. S. (2013). "Transformational and transactional presidents." Leadership 10(1): PP.  118-124 Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS SURVIVAL MANUAL: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS. 4th ed. Reave, L. (2005). "Spiritual values and practices related to leadership effectiveness." The Leadership Quarterly 16: 655-687 Rickards, T., and M. Clark (2006). Dilemmas of Leadership. Shrestha, A. K. (2012). Leadership Styles, Subordinates' Satisfaction with the Leader and Perceived Effectiveness: A Study in a Nepali Telecommunications Company: Kathmandu University School of Management Occasional Paper Tebeje, M. (ND) Neoliberal_Policy_Agenda &amp; Inequality_HE_Ethiopia Tipton, T. E. (2007). "Perceived Leadership Practices of Principals-Coaches and Principals-Non-coaches." Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Ramachandran, S., and V. R. Krishnan (2009). "Effect of Transformational Leadership on Followers’ Affective and Normative." Great Lakes Herald 3(1). Robson, Collins. (2008) Real-World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-researchers. 2nd ed. Black Well Publishing. Maldon, USA. Sadeghi, Amir, and Pihie, Zaidatol (2012). Transformational Leadership and Its Predictive Effects on Leadership Effectiveness. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 3,7. PP.186 Saint, W. (2004). "Higher Education in Ethiopia: The Vision and Its Challenges."  JHEA/RESA  2(3): 83-113 Sloven, M. (1960). "Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education, New York: Mc Graw-Hill in Guildford, J. P. and Fucher, B.  1973 ". Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of Leadership. New York: Free Press.  Taylor, C. M., et al. (2014). "Visionary leadership and its relationship to organizational effectiveness." Leadership &amp; Organization Development Journal 35(6). Tipton, T. E. (2007). "Perceived Leadership Practices of Principals-Coaches and Principals-Noncoaches." Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Voon, -., Ngui, K.S., and Ayob, N.B.   (2011). The influence of leadership styles on employees' job satisfaction in public sector organizations in Malaysia.  International Journal of Business, Management, and Social Sciences. Vol. 2, No. 1, 2011, pp. 24-32. www.ijbmss-ng.com. Voorhees, C.M., Brady, M.K., Calantone, R., Ramirez, E., 2015. Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 1–16. Waas, T., et al. (2012). "Sustainable Higher Education - Understanding and Moving Forward." Waits, D. (2015). "Obstacles to Leadership Effectiveness: The five critical mistakes to avoid." Leadership Practices. Woldegiorgis, A. A. (2015). "A Glance at Ethiopian Higher Education from Developmental State Perspective." Bahir Dar Journal of Education15(2). Yukl, G. A. (2006). Leadership in Organizations. Albany, State University of New York.</references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijhem.com/cdn/article_file/2020-08-30-12-31-44-PM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>Desalegn Sherkabu Abadama</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>Perception</keyword>
        <keyword>leadership styles</keyword>
        <keyword>organizational effectiveness</keyword>
        <keyword>public university</keyword>
        <keyword>higher education</keyword>
        <keyword>the university community</keyword>
        <keyword>leadership levels</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <metrics>
        <views>6714</views>
        <downloads>41</downloads>
        <citations>4</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
    <article>
      <id>75</id>
      <title>Reflecting on the HEA Framework for Internationalizing Higher Education &amp; on the ‘practical theory’ of Handal and Lauvas</title>
      <url>https://ijhem.com/details&amp;cid=75</url>
      <published_date>2020-08-30</published_date>
      <abstract>Internationalised curriculum development is critical to any institution aiming to approach internationalisation in a coherent way. Research on Internationalisation of the Curriculum (IoC), emphasizes the notion of curriculum as encompassing all aspects of learning and works at formal, hidden, and informal levels. The Higher Education Academy (HEA) developed a framework approaching internationalization of teaching, learning &amp; curriculum. Rachel Scudamore, in the guide Engaging Home and International Students, examined the relationship of culture &amp; learning, based on the ‘practical theory’ of Handal &amp; Lauvas (1987), providing useful information and suggestions that informs teaching philosophy. The present work, through critical literature review, reflects upon the HEA framework and Handal &amp; Lauvas’ practical theory, showing new challenges and issues of concerns. It provides recommendations for educators ‘why’ and ‘how’ to internationalize curriculum and teaching and concludes that Handal &amp; Lauvas’ work (1987) should continue to shape teaching approach nowadays.</abstract>
      <references>Bennett, C. (1986). Comprehensive multicultural education, theory and practice. Boston: Allyn &amp; Bacon Bordogna, C. &amp;  Harvey, H.(no date)  Reflecting on the HEA’s Internationalising Higher Education Framework,  https://my.heacademy.ac.uk/welcome/ Chism, N. V. N. (1998). Developing a philosophy of teaching statement. Essays on Teaching Excellence: Toward the Best. Academy, 9, 1–3. Croucher, K. &amp; Romer, 2007). Inclusivity in Teaching Practice and the Curriculum. Guides for Teaching and Learning in Archaeology. Number 6. Liverpool: Higher Education Academy. De Vita, G. (2001). Learning styles, culture and inclusive instruction in the multicultural classroom: a business and management perspective’. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38, 165–173. Green, W., &amp; Whitsed, C. (2015). Critical Perspectives on Internationalising the Curriculum in Disciplines. NL: Sense Publishers Green, W., &amp; Whitsed, C. (2013). Reflections on an alternative approach to continuing professional learning for internationalisation of the curriculum across disciplines. Journal of Studies in Introducing Critical Perspectives on Internationalising the Curriculum 21 International Education: Special Issue, Internationalisation of the Curriculum, and the Disciplines, 17(2), 148–164 Egron-Polak, E., &amp; Hudson, R. (2014). Internationalization of Higher Education: Growing expectations, fundamental values. Paris: IAU. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53: 106. Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s consequences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kreber, C. (2001). Designing teaching portfolios based on a formal model of the scholarship of teaching. In D. Lieberman &amp; C. Wehlburg (Eds.), To improve the academy (19, 285-305). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company Kolb, D.A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Leask, B. (2009). Using formal and informal curricula to improve interactions between home and international students. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(2), 205–221. Leask, B. (2013). Internationalising the curriculum in the disciplines – Imagining new possibilities. Journal of Studies in International Education: Special Issue, Internationalisation of the Curriculum, and the Disciplines, 17(2), 103–118. Leask, B., &amp; Bridge, C. (2013). Comparing internationalisation of the curriculum in action across disciplines: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43(1), 79–101. Morse, K. (2003). Does one size fit all? Exploring asynchronous learning in a multicultural environment., Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 37–55. Paul, B. and Arcodia, C. (2002). Linking learning style preferences and ethnicity: international students studying hospitality and tourism management in Australia’, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education. 1,15–27. Ramburuth, P. (2001). Cross cultural learning behaviour in higher education: perceptions versus practice, Paper Presented in the Proceedings of the Seventh International Literacy and Education Research Network (LERN) Conference on Learning, RMIT University, Melbourne, 5–9 July 2000, Available at: http://ultibase rmit edu.au/Articles/may01/ramburuth1.htm. Trowler, P., &amp; Cooper, A. (2002). Teaching and learning regimes: Implicit theories and recurrent practice in the enhancement of teaching and learning through educational programmes. Higher Education Research &amp; Development, 21(3), 221–240. Zeichner, K. &amp; Liston, D.P. (2011). Reflective teaching: An introduction. NY: Routledge</references>
      <pdf_url>https://ijhem.com/cdn/article_file/2020-08-30-12-33-45-PM.pdf</pdf_url>
      <authors>
        <author>Evangelia Fragouli</author>
      </authors>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>Internationalization</keyword>
        <keyword>Higher education</keyword>
        <keyword>teaching philosophy</keyword>
        <keyword>culture</keyword>
        <keyword>learning</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <metrics>
        <views>5403</views>
        <downloads>29</downloads>
        <citations>0</citations>
      </metrics>
      <declarations>
        <funding></funding>
        <conflict_of_interest></conflict_of_interest>
        <data_availability></data_availability>
        <author_contributions></author_contributions>
      </declarations>
      <supplementary_materials/>
    </article>
  </articles>
</issue_export_package>
