Research, Writing academic journals Paper organization Publishing

Publishing in quality academic journals is challenging. Authors who want to improve their chances of publishing in management and allied business and social science journals can save themselves time by ensuring that manuscripts are consistent with the journal’s aims and scope and what the field requires in terms of addressing unanswered research questions or improvements to current theory and evidence. It is well-understood if a manuscript lacks theoretical grounding or makes significant methodological or research design mistakes, it will probably be rejected. Researchers in the social sciences are typically well-trained in methods, statistical analysis, and research design. But doctoral programs and other masters-level research programs spend much less time on the situating, organizing, and writing of manuscripts and how they should be framed for publication. Oftentimes, an author may face rejection of his or her submitted manuscript not because of bad data or methods, but because of major framing and organizing issues. These problems are addressed within the context of writing clear introductions which form the basis for a complete and well-organized manuscript that will likely have an improved chance of publication.

• Abrahamson, E. (2008). 22 things I hate: Mini rants on management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 422–425.
• Acemoglu, D. (2003). Root causes. Finance & Development, 40(2), 26-30.
• Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Publishing in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(1), 1–8.
• Ahlstrom, D. (2011). A checklist for prospective authors of Asia Pacific Journal of Management.
• Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(3), 449-452.
• Ahlstrom, D. (2012). Several key reasons why a paper is likely to be rejected at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(3), 519–524.
• Ahlstrom, D. (2015). From the Editors: Publishing in the Journal of World Business. Journal of World Business, 50(2), 251-255.
• Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D. & Zhao, L. (2013). Turning good research into good publications.
• Nankai Business Review International, 4(2), 92-106.
• Ahlstrom, D., Chen, S.-j., & Yeh, K. S. (2010). Managing in ethnic Chinese communities: Culture, institutions, and context. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 341–354.
• Ahlstrom, D. & Ding, Z. (2014). Entrepreneurship in China: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 32(6), 610-618.
• Ahlstrom, D., Lamond, D. & Ding, Z. (2009). Re-examining some management lessons from military history. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(4), 617-642.
• Ahlstrom, D., Young, M. N., Chan, E. S., & Bruton, G. D. (2004). Facing constraints to growth? Overseas Chinese entrepreneurs and traditional business practices in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3), 263–285.
• Ashkanasy, N. M. & Humphrey, R. H. (2011). Current emotion research in organizational behavior. Emotion Review, 3(2), 214-224.
• 115   A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM)    www.ijhem.abrmr.com
• International Journal of Higher Education Management (IJHEM) Vol. 2  Number 1    August 2015
• Aveyard, H. (2010). Doing a literature review in health and social care: A practical guide. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
• Bartunek, J. M. & Rynes, S. L. (2010). The construction and contributions of implications for practice: What’s in them and what might they offer? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 100–117.
• Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L. & Ireland, R. D. (2006). What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter? Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 9-15.
• Baruch, Y., Konrad, A. M., Aguinis, H. & Starbuck, W. H. (Eds.) (2008). Opening the black box of editorship. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Baruch, Y., Sullivan, S. E., & Schepmyer, H. N. (Eds.) (2006). Winning reviews: A guide for evaluating scholarly writing. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bedeian, A.G. (2004). Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(2), 198-216.
• Bloom, N. & Van Reenen, J. (2010). Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 203-224.
• Bono, J. E., & McNamara, G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ – Part 2: Research design. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4) p. 657-660.
• Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Wan, J. C. C. (2003). Turnaround in East Asian firms: Evidence from ethnic overseas Chinese communities. Strategic Management Journal, 24 (6), 519-540.
• Cascio,  W.F.  (2012).  Methodological  issues  in  international  HR  management  research.  The
• International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(12), 2532-2545.
• Christensen, C. M. & Carlile, P. R. (2009). Course research: Using the case method to build and teach management theory. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(2), 240–251.
• Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1998). Research methods in science education. New York: Routledge. Colquitt, J. A. & George, G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ – Part 1: Topic choice. Academy of
• Management Journal, 54(3), 432-435.
• Colquitt, J. A. & Ireland, R. D. (2009). Taking the mystery out of AMJ’s reviewer evaluation form. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 224–228.
• Corley, K. G. & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.
• Cumming, D. & Walz, U. (2010). Private equity returns and disclosure around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 727-754.
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Cui, L., Meyer, K. E., & Hu, H. W. (2014). What drives firms’ intent to seek strategic assets by foreign direct investment? A study of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business, 49(4), 488–501.
• Cummings, L. L. & Frost, P. J. (Eds.). (1985). Publishing in the organizational sciences. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
• Cummings, L. L., & Frost, P. J. (Eds.). (1995). Publishing in the organizational sciences, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• 116   A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM)    www.ijhem.abrmr.com   
• International Journal of Higher Education Management (IJHEM) Vol. 2  Number 1    August 2015
• Daft, R. L. (1995). Why I recommended that your manuscript be rejected and what you can do about it. In L. L. Cummings & P. J. Frost (Eds.). Publishing in the organizational sciences: 164-182. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344.
• Dunbar, R. L. M. & Ahlstrom, D. (1995). Seeking the institutional balance of power: Avoiding the power of a balanced view. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 171-192.
• Eden, D. (2008). What authors need to know to navigate the review process successfully:
• Understanding  and  managing  the  editor’s  dilemma.  In  Y.  Baruch,  A.M.  Konrad,  H.
• Aguinis & W.H. Starbuck (Eds.). Opening the black box of editorship: 239-249. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Eden, C. & Huxham, C. (1996). Action research for management research. British Journal of Management, 7(1), 75-86.
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2): 219-245.
• Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1010-1037.
• Geletkanycz, M., & Tepper, B. J. (2012). Publishing in AMJ – Part 6: Discussing the implications.
• Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 256-260.
• Grant, A. M., & Pollock, T. G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ – Part 3: Setting the hook. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 873-879.
• Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioral research. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 26(4), 33–52.
• Hitt, M. A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E. & Svobodina, L. (2004). The institutional effects on strategic alliance partner selection in transition economies: China vs. Russia.
• Organization Science, 15(2), 173–185.
• Hollenbeck, J. R. (2008). The role of editing in knowledge development: Consensus shifting and consensus creation. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.). Opening the black box of editorship: 16-26. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Huang, C. L. (2007). Publish or perish! An editorial perspective. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 39(2), 223-229.
• Huang, Y., Chen, A., & Kao, L. (2012). Corporate governance in Taiwan: The nonmonotonic relationship between family ownership and dividend policy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(1), 39-58.
• Huff, A. S. (1999). Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Huff, A. S. (2008). Designing research for publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Kerlinger, F. N. (1995). Foundations of behavioral research. Bangalore: Prism Books Private Limited. Kilduff, M. (2007). The top ten reasons why your paper might not be sent out for review.
• Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 700-702.
• 117   A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM)    www.ijhem.abrmr.com    
• International Journal of Higher Education Management (IJHEM) Vol. 2  Number 1    August 2015
• Klein, K. J. & Zedeck, S. (2004). Theory in applied psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 931-933.
• Konrad, A. M. (2008). Knowledge creation and the journal editor's role. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.). Opening the black box of editorship: 3-15. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Latham, G. P. & Locke, E. A. (2009). Science and ethics: What should count as evidence against the use of goal setting? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(3), 88–91.
• Li, Y., Ahlstrom, D., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2010). A multilevel model of affect and organizational commitment. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(2), 193-213.
• Liu, Y., Wang, L. C., Zhao, L. & Ahlstrom, D. (2013). Board turnover In Taiwan’s public firms:
• An empirical study. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4), 1059-1086.
• Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (2009). Has goal setting gone wild, or have its attackers abandoned good scholarship? Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 17–23.
• Lohrke, F. T., Ahlstrom, D. & Bruton, G. D. (2012). Extending turnaround process research: Important lessons from the U.S. Civil War. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(2), 217-234.
• Machi, A. & McEvoy, B. T. (2008). The literature review: Six steps to success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Maheshwari, S. K. & Ahlstrom, D. (2004). Turning around a state owned enterprise: The case of Scooters India Limited. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(1/2), 75–101.
• Mar, P. & Young, M. N. (2001). Corporate governance in transition economies: A case study of two Chinese airlines. Journal of World Business, 36(3), 280-302.
• McCloskey, D. N. (2013). Tunzelmann, Schumpeter, and the hockey stick. Research Policy, 42(10), 1706-1715.
• Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61–80.
• Nair, A., Ahlstrom, D., & Filer, L. (2007). Localized advantage in a global economy: The case of Bangalore. Thunderbird International Business Review, 49(5), 591–618.
• Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal. 12(Winter), 61-74.
• Oetzel, J. & Doh, J. (2009). MNEs and development: a review and reconceptualization. Journal of World Business, 44(1), 108–120.
• Peng, M. W. & Dess, G. G. (2010). In the spirit of scholarship. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(2), 282–298.
• Peng, M. W. & Quan, M. J. (2009). A micro-macro link during institutional transitions. In L. Keister (Ed.). Work and Organizations in China (Research in the Sociology of Work series, vol. 19), 203-224. Oxford, UK: Emerald.
• Peng, M. W. & Su, W. (2014). Cross-listing and the scope of the firm. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 42-50.
• Peng, Z. L. & Zhao, H. D. (2012). Does organization citizenship behavior really benefit the organization? Study on the compulsory citizenship behavior in China. Nankai Business Review International, 3(1), 75-92.
• 118   A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM)    www.ijhem.abrmr.com
• International Journal of Higher Education Management (IJHEM) Vol. 2  Number 1    August 2015
• Pepper, A. & Gore, J. (2014). The economic psychology of incentives: An international study of top managers. Journal of World Business, 49(3), 350–361.
• Pillutia, M. M. & Thau, S. (2013). Organizational sciences’ obsession with “that’s interesting!”
• Consequences and an alternative. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 187-194. Ridley, D. (2008). The literature review: A step-by-step guide for students. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Rodrik, D. & Subramanian, A. (2003). The primacy of institutions (and what this does and does not mean). Finance & Development, 40(2), 31-34.
• Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., & Trebbi, F. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9(2), 131-165.
• Rynes, S. L. (2002). From the editors: Some reflections on contribution. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 311–313.
• Shane, S. (2008). The illusions of entrepreneurship: The costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Sparrowe, R.T. & Mayer, K.J. (2011). Publishing in AMJ  – Part 4: Grounding hypotheses.
• Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1098-1102.
• Spolaore, E. & Wacziarg, R. (2013). How deep are the roots of economic development? Journal of Economic Literature, 52(2), 325-369.
• Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., Ren, B., & Yan, D. (2012). A comparative ownership advantage framework for cross-border M&As: The rise of Chinese and Indian MNEs. Journal of World Business, 47(1): 4-16.
• Tsang, E. W. R. & Kwan, K.-m. (1999). Replication and theory development in organizational science: A critical realist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 759-780.
• Van De Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Vargo, S. L. & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.
• Vargo, S. L. & Morgan, F. W. (2005). Services in society and academic thought: A historical analysis. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 42-53.
• Wang, L. C., Ahlstrom, D., Nair, A., & Hang, R. Z. (2008). Creating globally competitive and innovative products: China's next Olympic challenge. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 73(3): 4-15.
• Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495.
• Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5e). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Young, M. N., Tsai, T., Wang, X., Liu, S., & Ahlstrom, D. (2014). Strategy in emerging economies and the theory of the firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(2), 331–354.
• Zedeck, S. (2008). Editing a top academic journal. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.). Opening the black box of editorship: 145-156. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
• 119   A Journal of the Academy of Business and Retail Management (ABRM)    www.ijhem.abrmr.com
• International Journal of Higher Education Management (IJHEM) Vol. 2  Number 1    August 2015
• Zhang, Y. A. & Shaw, J.D. (2012). Publishing in AMJ – Part 5: Crafting the methods and results.
• Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 8-12.
• Zhao, L., Gu, H., Yue, C., & Ahlstrom, D. (2013). Consumer welfare and GM food labeling: A simulation using an adjusted Kumaraswamy distribution. Food Policy, 42, 58-70