Keyword

University commercialisation of knowledge university's organisational structure university's co-operation with the environment

Abstract

The paper presents the analysis of universities' potential for knowledge transfer to the business environment. The first part of the paper shows the analysis of university organisational units related to various parts of the innovation process. Each stage of the process creates distinct challenges for university operations, hence in the paper the basic framework to observe the capacity of organisational structures to respond to them has been constructed. The analysis focuses on relatively large units with complex operations, such as technology transfer centres, as well as on the organisational role of one-man positions, such as dean’s representatives for business relations. The results of the theoretical analysis are referred to the results of the research concerning knowledge transfer practices among universities in Lodz (Poland). A total of thirty-five cases of knowledge transfer practices were included in the analysis. The analysis conducted in the Lodzkie Region covered types of practices, the initiative of carrying out practices, their duration, the nature of practices, their subject scope and impact, as well as risks and benefits associated with implementing knowledge transfer practices. The preliminary exploration, interviews and innovation studies conducted indicate that the analysis covered a vast majority of such practices

 


Full Text : PDF

References
  1. Audretsch, D., Aldridge, T., T., 2009. Scientist commercialization as conduit of knowledge spillovers. Annuals of Regional Science, 43, 897–905.
  2. Bessant, J., and Tidd J., 2007. Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Chichester: Wiley.
  3. Bozeman, B., 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 627-655, DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1.
  4. Brown, R., 2016. Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 23 (2), 189-205, DOI:
  5.  10.1080/13662716.2016.1145575. 
  6. Bstieler, L., Hemmert M., Barczak G., 2015. Trust Formation in University–Industry Collaborations in the U.S. Biotechnology Industry: IP Policies, Shared Governance, and Champions. Product Development & Management Association, 32(1), 111-121, DOI: 
  7. 10.1111/jpim.12242.
  8. Burgelman, R. A., Christensen, C. M., Wheelwright, S.C., 2004. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
  9. Chai, S., Shih, W., 2016. Bridging science and technology through academic–industry partnerships. Research Policy, 45(1), 148-158, doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.007.
  10. Conway, S., Steward, F., 2009. Managing and shaping innovation, Oxford: University Press.
  11. D’Este P., Patel, P., 2007. University – industry linkage In the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36, 1295–1313. 
  12. Drucker, J., Goldstain, H., 2007. Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches. International Regional Science Review, 30(1), 20-46.
  13. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, Ch., Cantisano Terra B.R., 2000. The future of the university and the University of the Future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.
  14. Głodek, P., Wiśniewska, M., 2015. Uczelniany scouting wiedzy, jako element systemu komercjalizacji wiedzy w ramach uczelni wyższej. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług, 121, Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego nr 891, Szczecin, 279-292.
  15. Goduscheit, R., Ch., Knudsen, M. P., 2015. How Barriers to Collaboration Prevent Progress in Demand for Knowledge: A Dyadic Study of Small and Medium-Sized Firms, Research and Technology Organizations and Universities. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 29-54, DOI: 10.1111/caim.12101.
  16. Grimpe, Ch., Hussinger, K., 2013. Formal and Informal Knowledge and Technology Transfer from Academia to Industry: Complementarity Effects and Innovation Performance. Industry and Innovation, 20 (8), 683-700, DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2013.856620.
  17. Hewitt-Dundas, N., 2012. Research intensity and knowledge transfer activity in UK universities. Research Policy, 41 (2), 262-275. 
  18. Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., Minkov M., 2011, Kultury i organizacje, zaprogramowanie umysłu, 3rd edition, PWE, Warsaw.
  19. Huggins, R., Johnston, A., Stride Ch., 2012. Knowledge networks and universities: Locational and organizational aspects of knowledge transfer interactions. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24 (7-8), 475-502, doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.618192.
  20. Hughes, A., Kitson, M., 2012. Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: new evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, doi:10.1093/cje/bes017.
  21. Krogh, G. Von, 1998. Care in Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40(3), p. 133-153.
  22. Lehmann, E. E., Menter, M., 2015. University–industry collaboration and regional health. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-24, DOI 10.1007/s10961-015-9445-4.
  23. Lichtenthaler, U., Lichtenthaler, E., 2009. A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315-1338.
  24. Łobacz, K., Niedzielski, P., 2015. Uczelnie wyższe, jako element procesu komercjalizacji wiedzy w Polsce – wyzwania i bariery. In: P. Głodek, M. Wiśniewska, (Eds.), Budowa potencjału uczelni wyższej do współpracy z przedsiębiorstwami. Rola scoutingu wiedzy. Łódź: University of Lodz, 81-104.
  25. Maietta, O. W., 2015. Determinants of university–firm R&D collaboration and its impact on innovation: A perspective from a low-tech industry. Research Policy, 44(7), 1341-1359, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.006
  26. Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U. & Woerter, M., 2008, University-Industry Knowledge and Technology Transfer In Switzerland: What University Scientists Think About Cooperation With Private Enterprises, Research Policy, 37, 1865-1883.
  27. Muscio, A., Vallanti, G., 2014. Perceived Obstacles to University–Industry Collaboration: Results from a Qualitative Survey of Italian Academic Departments, Industry and Innovation, 21(5), 410-429, DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2014.969935.
  28. Pinto, H., Fernandez-Esquinas, M., Uyarra, E., 2015. Universities and Knowledge-intensive Business Services (KIBS) as Sources of Knowledge for Innovative Firms in Peripheral Regions. Regional Studies 49, 1873–1891,
  29.  doi.org.ebscohan2320.han3.lib.uni.lodz.pl/10.1080/00343404.2013.85396
  30. Philbin, S. P., 2010, Developing and Managing University-Industry Research Collaborations through a Process Methodology/Industrial Sector Approach, Journal of Research Administration, Vol. XLI, no. 3, 51-68.
  31. Probst, G., 1998. Practical Knowledge Management: A Model That Works, Prism, Second Quarter, Arthur D. Little.
  32. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2014, 2014. European Commission, doi: 10.2873/84730.
  33. Segarra-Blasco, A., Arauzo-Carod, J-M., 2008. Sources of innovation and industry–university interaction: Evidence from Spanish firms. Research Policy, 37, 1283-1295, doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.003.
  34. Shane, S., 2005. Government policies for encourage economic development through entrepreneurship: the case of technology transfer. In: S. Shane (Ed.), Economic development through entrepreneurship. Government, university and business linkages, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 33-49.
  35. Smith, H., L., Baghi-Sen, S., 2012. The Research University, entrepreneurship and regional development: Research propositions and current evidence. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24 (5-6), 383-404, doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.592547.
  36. Stawasz, E., 2009. Wybrane zagadnienia metodyki oceny projektów transferu technologii. In:  Z. Wysokińska, E. Stawasz, P. Głodek (Eds.), Wybrane metody i mierniki oceny transferu technologii w obszarze innowacyjnych projektów i ich efektów rynkowych, Radom: Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji. Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, 93-120.
  37. Stawasz, E., 2015. Determinants of knowledge transfer processes in a region. In: E.  Sobczak, B. Bal-Domańska, A. Raszkowski (Eds.), Local and Regional Economy in Theory and Practice, Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics, 394, Wrocław: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, 166-174.
  38. Tidd J., Bessant J., Pavitt K., 2005, Managing Innovation. Integrating technological market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  39. Van den Ende, J., Dolfsma, W., 2005. Technology-push, Demand-pull and the Shaping of Technological Paradigms: Patterns in the Development of Computing Technology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(1), 83-99.
  40. Wiśniewska, M., Głodek, P., 2015. Scouting wiedzy w ramach uczelni wyższej. In: P. Głodek, M. Wiśniewska (Eds.), Budowa potencjału uczelni wyższej do współpracy z przedsiębiorstwami. Rola scoutingu wiedzy. Lódź: University of Lodz, 11-24.