Keyword

Case method B-school Pedagogy Accounting theory

Abstract

In a recent paper, use of the case method as the primary means of instruction was criticized for failing to adequately bring together both theory and practice (Pasricha, 2016).  The purpose of the current paper is to rebut (and affirm) some of the concerns that Pasricha had with the case method as well as to provide an example of a case that addresses concerns raised in the Pasricha paper.  The example case provided in the current paper addresses all of Pasricha’s concerns and demonstrates that a well-constructed case can combine theory and practice.  The case method, as currently used in many business schools, often does not specifically require the application of theory to practice.  Requiring learners to apply theory to a problem from an actual business situation can reinforce theory in ways that simply reciting theory cannot accomplish.  This author intends to show that the case method is good pedagogy.  The problem is not the case method; the problem is the application of the case method.
 
 


Full Text : PDF

References
  1. American Crystal Sugar, Quarterly Financial Statements 2012-2013 accessed at www.sec.gov, through Edgar.  
  2. Eraut, M. (1994).  Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence, London:  Falmer.  Master eBook ISBN 13: 978-0-203-48601.6.  Part 1 – Professional Knowledge – Its Character, Development and Use:  The Influence of Context on Knowledge.
  3. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 1985 .Elements of Financial Statements, Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts Statement 6, Norwalk, CT: FASB.  
  4. Jurenas, Remy, Congressional Research Service, “Sugar program:  The Basics, CRS: 7-5700, R42535, March 14, 2013.
  5. Parkinson, A. and Chew L. (2016).  An analysis of applied professional teaching practices in relation to research and policy.  International Journal of Higher Education Management, 3(1), pp. 30-40.
  6. Pasricha, T.  (2016). Sorry Harvard, but I don’t like the Case Method.  International Journal of Higher Education Management, 3(1), pp 41-48.
  7. Stanford.  2017. Stanford University, “The Case Method of Instruction”
  8.  http://web.stanford.edu/class/ee353/case.htm” accessed 24 August,2017.
  9. Turow, S. (1977). One L.  G. P. Putnam & Sons.  Massachusetts, USA.
  10. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency.  Washington, DC 20250.  “Sugar Loan” 10-SU (Revision 4)
  11. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, Economic Research Service, Situation and Outlook, “Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook,” September 18, 2013.  SSM-M-301
  12. Wexler, Alexandra.  The Wall Street Journal.  “Sugar producer Takes Unusual Late Loan.”  Updated September 5, 2013  
  13. online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424127887323893004579055253737728862.html#printMode?KEYWORDS=Wexler